M      E      T      A      C      O      D      E

______________________

Definition    Function    Reflection

D E F I N I T I O N

A  Metacode is an a-priori constitutional | contractual primary order codification of vertical-hierarchical determination integratively norming the 'categorical and existential imperative' of an individual human self based, society-centric, interdisciplinary framework for the anthropocenic transitional | transformational Metapolity re- | engineering and regimes building by conducting equivalent MetaLeadership and adequate MetaGovernance.

A  Metacode comprises the respective subject's will and cognition, the telos and primary values including the real-world correlation matrix. Accordingly, a Metacode can furtherly be described as the

• integration of universal law, norms, principles, maxims of transcendence, metaphysical orders, law of thinking, theoretical frameworks, individual | collective will, and determination,

• syndication of ethical, cultural, social, emotional, and soul deducted values, subjective and "objective" norms,

• inclusion group | societal standards, social contracts, organizational policy guidelines, normative concepts, legal codes, directives, regulations, and codes of conduct,

• overarching 'nomos' of different enteties' laws and/or bodies of law by ruling the normative competition and power of norm spaces, and by determining the integratively coordinating meta-codificational primacy ('coincidentia oppositorum'),

• applying to a specific target category like the superior maxims of leadership policy and/or a comprehensive metasystemic governance policy ...

F U N C T I O N

A MetaCode is the constutional-normative grid of policy determination, the meta-guideline of leadership and the corresponding systemic governance. Its functionalities are especially to apply approaching transitional processes and transformational challenges, means i. a. to be applied as to

• transcendent universalization and unification of guiding principles, constitutional norms, and social contract standards in accordance with the laws of thought | principles of cognition,

• transpersonal concertation and transsystemic synthesis of constitutional rationales and mindsets for generating normative metapolitical concordance and identity creation,

• Normative-constitutional fusion of the eligible, interdependent, and subsidiary governance policies of connected bodies | entities as individual, autonomous societal organizations, institutions, states, etc.,

• hierarchic, transformative synthetization of the decisive micro-polities, political | social systems and their regulatory frameworks as well as hybrid legal and juridical orders,

• the normative grid for determination, communication, and coordination, for shaping | steering | monitoring the entire governing process, the input and the output of the governing system(s), and for the super-vision of coherence saving processes,

• providing a reflexive, multi-perspective and/or "bird's-eye" view in policy making, institutional, and organizational processing and the implementative accordance and compliance regarding ethical principles | values | norms | codes of conduct etc.,

• the decisive compass for developing normative and law enforcement strategies and structures of vertical and horizontal organizational / institutional governmentality,

• concentrating and managing the complexity, plurality, and tangled hierarchies of normative prcessing: power-sharing, negotiation, conflict conciliation and communication, on both the inter- and intra-institutional | organizational levels,

• referencing back the coordination of the reciprocal interdependence among operationally autonomous actors, organizations, and the functional systems' hierarchical, market, and network governance: the systematization of relationships between the institutional orders and functional systems including civil societal orders,

• architecturing the combination of different ideas, methods, mechanisms, strategies, and styles of governance also referring to self-organizing, inter-organizational | institutional networks: the rules of self-regulation and the conditions of self-steering | -regulating policy | inter-societal networks,

• strategic "roadmap" approaching the social structures, legal norms, cultural standards, hierarchies and legitimacy, benchmarks, performance indicators, quality controls, principles of best practice,

• paradigmatically redesigning networks, facilitating normative change and the legal | juridical re-regulation of structures, forms, and objectives by organizing the conditions for self-organization and "collibration",

• normative strategizing in collaborative policy innovation networks to establish concerted policy action by framing, designing, facilitating participation | inclusion particularly as a regime building process.

R E F L E C T I O N

Analysing, strategizing, and examining the utilization of a MetaCode a farsighted executive and thinker in principle might realize: The reflective and communicational process of MetaCodification merges the guiding paradigms and qualifying potentials of constituting the 'world formula' of future governing | governance and especially the determination of future leadership as concentration on and concertation of self-governing - on regional as global scale.

The MetaCodes concept contains the principle and structural elements and essential keystones for manufacturing and manifesting a post-Westphalian co-creative, constitutional policy culture and order of humanity's complmentary development and interconnectivity enhancement.

A transpersonally qualifying essence of a Meta-Leader and transformationally progressive, dynamic policy | metapolity developer with a shaping spirit for the culture and the sustaining significance of her | his public | private organization's functions and targets needs fully legitimized governability based on formative and determinative normativity. This process starts with developing a MetaCode as fundament and common ground for concertation. Because a MetaCode ...

• guarantees the self implementation of transpersonal | organizational sovereign guidance based on clear normativity without the dependency on | restriction of just formal authority.

• guarantees the quantitative legitimation by integral codification processing and - even much more important - saves the qualitative legitimation by inter- | acting based on conscious decision processes.

• claims the self-referential supremacy of normativity and normative primacy of meta-constitutionalism, creates ethical | social competence and procedural guidelines for micro-political self-governing, strengthens the compliance also of the codes of conduct especially for the coordination management of collaborative policy network relationships.

• facilitates a dynamic, resilient ruling system with the highest capable management and enforcement quality guaranteed by the supremacy of transcendently determined MetaCodification safing a sustaining culture of organizational governmentality.

• dissolves the traditional systems' principal-agent-dilemma: Transparency, inclusion, concentric dialogue garantuee consequence, reliability, and continuity based on the dynamic processing of perception and internalization, real participation and creative solution, systemic resilience and timely actualization; the trust generating and truth finding avenue of adequately codified ruling creates not only procedural, but substantial justice and its adequate processing. This also applies to the area of international relations policy governance and especially to internal | external crises | conflicts incl symetric | asymetric formations.

• defines the leadership and governance processing of free minds and souls and facilitates the openly clearing consciousness of an individually guiding self. In order to guarantee the best usage and effectivity there is the necessity of equivalently resonating, orchestrated individual subjects in order to save the congruent calibration of power legitimation: via MetaCodification.

• allows MetaLeadership to develop an systemically integrative coordination as the best way of highest possible individual self-regulation of every participant including transpersonalized responsibility and the capacities of a real good will. These characteristics are the corresponding components of the MetaLeader's determinative rationality and communicative conviction to be fully developed by being based on a common-ground framework of a MetaCode. And an a-priori MetaCode is even the more a systematic, substantial precondition to meet ...

• the multi-facetted challenges of the anthropocenic age to facilitate the question of a human adequate societal future design | concept and implementation. Independently of the size and/or societal function of an organizational unit, a MetaCode contains the basic components and necessary cognitive systematic determinants of future meta- | governance creation for an adequately (self-) ruling / governing of the inner | outer order of human societies on this planet as a space of free will.

• follows the logic of a broader post-Westphalian multilateral 'meta-constitutional discourse' concept for non-state and state actors to develop and institutionalize an innovative organizational policy order: The hierarchical structure of a MetaCode for the governance allows an alternative form of non-hierarchical, but sovereign governing that is not based on direct and top-down control but a plurality of ways of influencing and/or coordinating dynamic negotiation processes and the positions | actions of self-governing, self-organizing actors, and self-adjusting practices.

• introduces and obtains a cosmopolitan meta-constitutionalism for the transitional and transformative innovation of evolutionary self-| governing as inclusive coordinating policy guidance and management of complexity, multiplicity, and diversity, dynamically facilitating and ensuring the interior | exterior connectivity with meta-political definition, identification, and manifestation processes.

• incorporates the regulatory triptych of polity generation: constitution-building, generating the substantial content of prescriptive constitutional norms, and institutional architecture structuring beyond the traditional matrix of ego-, states-centrism, nations, and state-based international | intergovermental system.

• frames and structures the cognitive metaphysics, the metamorphosing sublimity, the substantial power legitimization, and the concordance processing of the dynamic vertical equilibrium between determinative universal mind | law and conditional real world self-governing, based on the transpersonal individuality of the single human, group, and societal self, its enforcement of meta-codification and manifestation.

• substantiates and justifies the de- | transpersonalization and self-referential legitimization for its own reason and the authority of meta-normativity by generating the determination processing of meta-power and operating as a legislative meta-order.

• restrains and replaces the declining factual | substantial normativity of outgrown states-| government-centric, paternalistic authority and formal sovereignty as well as the egocentrically projecting personalism of masses causing an increasing anarchic disruption and systemic erosion also with growing impact on the international system and global "order".

• systematizes the reason of institutional order as a direct expression of the social contract and societal will in accordance to | concordance with the common, synthesized, and universalized principles, guiding values and paradigms forming a kind of "eternity guarantee": legitimacy, accountability, transparency, integrity, consensual authority acknowledgement of cognitional enhancement and transcending wisdom for humane self-governing and coordinating meta-governance | -governing.

• associates and synthesizes individual and transpersonal, societal, and inter- | transsocietal autonomous value spheres of dignity, cultures, practices, experiences, issues, know-how, needs, objectives, motivations, morals, rationals, mindsets, worldviews, structures, characteristics, and the dynamic actualization processes of changing paradigms, based on the human progressing self- | consciousness especially about societal, political-organizational development, the elevating emotional and cognitive-spiritual intelligence, and human self-empowerment by further transcendence and connectivity enhancement.

• syndicates the paradigms and principles of multiple micro-policy generation primarily as cognitive-creative and meta-connective coherence processing, as higher frequent, normative, hybrid facilitation by synoptically transcending values, norms, rules, ethics etc. including cultural particulars and also humans' adequate social, societal, and emotional demands [non-ideological, non-religious].

• enables polycentric governance codification and metapolitical agenda-setting in dynamic procedures of concertation, unification of diverse, multiple, interdependent, and mutual complimentary, a/symmetric networks of micropolities in a heterarchical and dialogic approach by ultimately prevailing transpersonal and transsystemic authority | real sovereignty and by constraining / rejecting egocentricity and inadequate "supremacy" of micro-political subunits.

• encourages the multistakeholders' engagement | settings and manages the polycentric coordination and syndication of processes which are open to anyone being euqivalently qualified and/or any interdependent entity coming in and fully participating the discourses, referring to an individual, group, or organization that has a direct or indirect interest of societal relevance: these may be businesses, civil society, governments, states, interstate | intergovernmental institutions, and non-governmental organizations.

• closes the lack of adequate consideration and political institutionalization of human factors, values, and humanities, caused by a largely non-standardized globalization and the methods, procedures, and bureaucratizing techniques of global governance, which in fact neglected any maxim | paradigm of ruling the supremacy of human transpersonal individuality, humane identity, and social justice.

• creates the equivalent public sphere for exterior policy implementation of the interior determination | inner guidance of transpersonal individuals and adequate societal | transsocietal self-governing, particularly its ruling competence for constructive future policy planning and the identifying systemic foundation of metagoverning multiple networks and multilateral relationships.

• provides the networked societies' accountable, multilevel self-governing polity | policy generation achieving the multiplicity of collective and asymmetric dynamics and challenges of governability by mediating, building, steering, and heterarchically processing the intersection of three types of determinative relationship management and discourse dynamics: authoritative, strategically competitive, or dialogic.

• enhances the policy generating, ruling, and reigning competence and legitimization processes by reinventing forms of institutionalizing heterarchical power organization, based on the integral, inclusive, and convergent coordination and syndication of multiple realms, levels, lines, scales, and relationships of societal and transitional governmental stakeholders' systemic networks.

• co-creates the common ground aiming for the implementation of the vertical equilibrium between metaphysical and real leadership as the primacy of human capacity to develop and to operate an inter-societal governance regime as concordant world order.